Why do not we make it a job, as a job, To view as a job. Just Us Women often take this problem, if we want to change ourselves professionally on the one hand, but not to, and also want to. And on the other hand we are not unsuccessful in the job, occupy corresponding positions, enjoy certain privileges, that let us know, that this job really but really is in order. And yet he is not satisfied, either because it is not the job, one can exercise until his retirement and wants. You just know, that if the woman 45 + (and sometimes sooner or later) exceeds, the work situation is not simple and will take precautions already precaution. And still can not now be the right time, to professionally change. How to focus on one task, to see them as a task rather than a passion?

Is certainly important to prioritize, wrap it all at once, helps no one, not the partner, the children (if there) nor the present or future job. I want to be there for my children, I want to seek a new life plan, I want a new partner, will ich , will ich… Honestly sometimes helps even a new hairstyle, for something to change in yourself.

Today, culture is still an economic value? Grants and subsidies in times of financial- and anrollend-translucent economic crisis turned back, as a result, that art and culture are dependent on support from the business community and patron of. However, the funds of the Company will be rejected and less budget cuts are now a gladly seen and welcome argument for sponsorship.

Also laws around anti-corruption and the political drama of the committees to do the rest, that partnerships between art and business are resolved more often or only apparently extended.
What does this mean for the development and progress of cultural and artistic projects, Works and those occupational group? Who can occur for Art and Culture, if it can not policy? In America, then determine individual patron, was wann, where and how to play. Analog zu “Who pays, creates in.”, only can this be the variety, we desire?!

In Vienna there are projects, received little to no support from the City of Vienna, However, unequal valuable for districts, Grätzeln and the persons concerned are. It is the dedicated artists and freelancers, who invest their money here (see Vorgartenmarkt) and are glad, if at least one “red” ZERO comes out. But also in projects or. Initiators, have been highly successful Austrian Cultural produced and exported far beyond our borders, there is support – and not always (but of course often) there are monetary benefits, help – and here it is the money from friends, Family and the money is used the under the mattress to the realization.

Jobs, Projects and friends work as partnerships. If there is no communication, expectations are not communicated, then something is constantly broken. And it is the same, if it comes to writing a presentation, why is that the garbage out or accepting the friend, that …

I have not learned it today, this is “to smell” – that's what my dad used very often, a typical man / woman history – what someone wants from me. And in a functioning relationship you discuss it from, gets to know his opponent and his own limitations, but the job is a little, as with the first friends, offended at first exhilarated and death. To just one day then you will never want another. And often remains a / r insulted back. And what can we learn from? Mostly nothing, thereby are easier to master the challenges in the job, Talking with each other. Only the most is in no goals, Project plans or job descriptions.

If a company waives employee, have the relevant know-how, it's usually, everyone is replaceable and the know-how is wiederaufbaubar. What will vote most likely also.

Aber was wenn ein Klein-/Mittelbetrieb nur auf die Leistungen eines Mitarbeiters referenzieren kann? Alles was bisher umgesetzt wurde, alle Umsätze, zukünftigen Revenues sind Ergebnisse aus dieser Arbeit eines einzelnen. Sich darauf auszuruhen ist natürlich fatal und bringt ein Unternehmen noch ein paar Jahre weiter über die Runden. Was wenn eben Weitblick, Umsetzungstärke und der Gegenpol fehlt? Wie schnell und leicht ist das Kapital Mensch wirklich ersetzbar?

Aber auch in Konzernen, wenn man meint, dass es nicht auffällt, ob jetzt jemand weg ist oder nicht, kann der fehlende Mitarbeiter einen Teil der Seele des Unternehmens ausgemacht haben. Warum man sich mit einem Unternehmen identifiziert oder nicht? Warum man gerne länger im Büro bleibt, sich engagierter zeigt, als die eines anderen Bereiches …

Wenn etwas fehlt in einem Unternehmen, dann kann man so tun, als ob es nie dagewesen wäre, oder man setzt sich aktiv auseinander. Abhanden gekommene Mitarbeiter müssen doch nicht ausgegrenzt und ausgeschlossen werden, im Gegenteil würde ich empfehlen sich immer wieder – wenn es nicht die Konkurrenzklausel ausschliesst – mit ehemaligen Mitarbeitern zusammenzusetzen, da sie mittlerweile nicht nur einen Aussenblick vorweisen können, sondern auch das Unternehmen noch mit all’ seinen Herausforderungen kennen. Und sehr wahrscheinlich zu einem besseren Preis als die McKinseys, BCGs dieser Welt.

In den Medien wurde wieder vermehrt über die mangelnde Zufriedenheit der Mitarbeiter in ihren Jobs berichtet. Vor allem darauf zurückzuführen, that employees see themselves in a culture of lack of appreciation,,de,How can I do a job and my work like and be loyal to that company,,de,if the daily perception shows me,,de,that employees per se nothing worth,,de,Or the mentality prevails,,de,that employees but please their energy into the,,de,conflict,,de,are stuck,,de,as in a,,de,Together,,de,And executives are employees,,de,be it from board members,,de,Owners or investors,,de,but does that mean,,de,that they received just unthinkingly and execute commands should,,de,What is so surprising me,,de,I know that managers and teams,,de. Wie kann ich auch einen Job und meine Tätigkeit mögen und loyal dem Unternehmen gegenüber sein, wenn die tagtägliche Wahrnehmung mir zeigt, dass Mitarbeiter per se nichts mehr wert sind. Beziehungsweise die Mentalität vorherrscht, dass Mitarbeiter doch bitte ihre Energie in das “Gegeneinander” stecken sollen, als in ein “Miteinander”.

Und auch Führungskräfte sind Mitarbeiter, sei es von Vorständen, Eigentümern oder Investoren, aber heißt das, dass diese einfach unreflektiert Befehle empfangen und ausführen sollen? Was mich so verwundert ist, dass ich Führungskräfte kenne und auch Teams, who also works without this reprisals and pressure but no mercy knows and slowly but steadily changed the whole structure,,de,do not fit into this new structure is subordinating,,de,go out or bullied,,de,Thus, as well as a counter-trend arises,,de,that work must be more,,de,than money and the activity itself,,de,but I see it rather as,,de,that by giving a name to this otherness,,de,it will be easier,,de,to accept this difference and to understand,,de,And to understand it's still,,de,each child,,de,whether with what traits and characteristics,,de,requires respect,,de,Understanding and being there,,de,And with the knowledge of the needs of the child as a parent I can try to respond properly,,de,And if it was finally right then,,de. The, die nicht in dieses neue sich unterordnende Gefüge passen, gehen oder werden hinaus gemobbt.

Somit entsteht aber auch ein Gegentrend, dass Arbeit mehr sein muss, als nur Geld und die Tätigkeit an sich.

A company and its senior staff, as CEO should not read the e-mail traffic of their employees and not let their email account open.

I have been approached by a client that is on this fact. It has the feeling, that their manager is reading. It's just a vague feeling, but sometimes hints are there in his statements to her life, where they do, that she has not told in this direction. She now has the opportunity to speak directly to their superiors on it or find out about the IT, whether their suspicion is confirmed. For even the IT managers, if he knows about it, is punishable by law with this action.

I know of cases, where e-mails employees were tapping and also e-mail accounts of employees, the sick or. were on maternity leave were easily opened. All illegal! It says nothing about an employee from, if he flirts with another employee, or sexual desires which he / she entertains or what practices would be tried. All illegal! And if people bad at talking about their superiors and colleagues, that is one of them and has proven cleansing power.

The work and performance must take priority and if that does not fit, then it is necessary to change something. Because everything else is illegal.

We adults have forgotten how to play with each other. The children we explain, that you should take into consideration, do not make the toys of other broken, no one hurt, … And we ignore the Job – the play of adults – often these simple rules. As long as everything goes well, find it hard to, these little tips, Gut feeling, that an advance warning or even the exaggerated be friendly.

But I also know business partner, Shareholders and executives, trying their enjoyment of the game with each other and with each other to promote and share. But these are often the people, which have a fixed personality, to an estimated friends call their own and have values ​​and principles. As the, the ideas and creativity her husband, Enthusiastic partners and customers. Is engaged himself and not tired, to question itself. For advice, how to best deal with appreciative with an employee.

And then there are also those, call the other a dreamer and a drunkard, which you do not want to have part in the company, but his ideas and his contacts with the UN already. Or the, which in turn try to play off through a third party, because management is unable, Money wasted and if you wanted to and could, they just wanted to get out have. But the best part, that these people call themselves friends and put together this afternoon conspiratorial up, to the evening to think back to, where the other has violated the rules of the game.

We read every day about the time the moral dissonance in professional action in the economic and political. In most cases we are talking about people with interesting names and can not understand the audacity of the actors. to want to have this more and more and to represent mainly the opinion,,de,that an all deserve yes,,de,you do nothing unjust,,de,caused incomprehension,,de,However, not only in large corporations and in the political events of the day corrupt acts can be found,,de,Also in business,,de,where no control exists by investors,,de,Banks and above all by the personal value proposition,,de,what and what is right wrong,,de,Time and money the company is considered a personal advanced spot,,de,Be it,,de,whether to go or during working hours, the employee cosmetics for personal use,,de,like children manners abused,,de,But particularly questionable is,,de,if the partner is times as written non-chalant,,de,you there is a convention in August in Seychelles,,de,which lasts,,de, dass einem das alles ja zusteht, man nichts unrechtes tut, verursacht Unverständnis. Jedoch nicht nur in großen Konzernen und im politischen Tagesgeschehen sind korrupte Handlungen zu finden. Auch in Unternehmen, wo keine Kontrolle vorhanden ist durch Investoren, Banken und vor allem durch die persönliche Wertvorstellung, was richtig und was falsch ist. Geld und Zeit der Firma wird als persönliche erweiterte Kassa betrachtet. Sei es, ob man während der Arbeitszeit zur Kosmetik geht oder die Mitarbeiterin für private Zwecke, wie Kindersitten missbraucht. Aber besonders fragwürdig wird es, wenn dem Partner mal so non-chalant geschrieben wird: “… du da ist im August ein Kongress auf den Seychellen, der dauert 3 Days … would it ran not something for us and then we hang equal to the holidays,,de,de flights we run about the company and also Hotel,,de,is yes then already equal,,de,Only that give the whole family would go by Annex aims,,de,Only those companies,,de,Managing Director and acting Manager just not in the papers and watch it right to do so,,de,but it's just easier on all,,de,Grosskopferten,,en,to curse and to face morally them,,de, de Flüge lassen wir über die Firma laufen und Hotel auch, ist ja dann auch schon gleich …” Nur dass eben die ganze Familie mit Anhang fahren hätte sollen.

Nur das solche Unternehmen, Geschäftsführer und handelnden Manager eben nicht in der Zeitung stehen und es für richtig ansehen so zu handeln, aber es ist eben leichter über all’ the “Grosskopferten” zu schimpfen und sich moralisch über sie zu stellen.