I've so a few personal feelings with Kant and this semester it is time, that I have to ask him. For I have the same 2 Seminars and a main lecture on Kant, his morality, of practical reason and the categories included. I did not like him so far actually, because he looks like a withered hand so unappealing. Das muss man – I think – may say, because for him it also often involves beliefs and perceptions. Aesthetics after Kant was not about the art and the beautiful things, but it, how we can look at the subject and thus give him knowledge. And my conclusion was, that he comes across simply unsympathetic. So null Humor und so. He was also of the opinion, that may be found only someone inlet at his academy, understands the mathematics.

He also likes to talk about the “us” and does not mean the number of individuals we, but he thinks the “transzendentale Subjekt”. It is complicated and you might almost think, that it makes it a lot of fun, that we need to think again, what he calls here so therefore thinks. Because ultimately it does say, that we “practice, practice, need to practice in order to understand”.