I just bothered the cornerstones Schulreform 2016/17 read. This is all just no real reform. I recommend the relevant working groups to deal with the concept of reform, before they take this word in the mouth.

The reform should be a conscious and deliberate changes in the social context. This may well quickly and radically (!) its, without however being forcibly. The achievement made by the consensus.

So before I explain further: A consensus is NOT the lowest common denominator, to be agreed upon. In contrast to the points of the present “Papierls”.
The consensus is an agreement, which shall be consistent, that is,. it serves to achieve the optimum, without losing face. That. does anyone hurt, because it comes to achieve a common goal.

In a school reform is about the school and thus to the students, not the teacher or the directors. Students are however considered in this little Papierl. What we want for our children and what will our children (especially the older ones) for themselves. In the Popper school students may autonomously select none compartments, which are not quite as interesting. Why would this really have happened only in the advanced level?

my son, 7, loves text invoices and achieves this with a passion, 5 Bills are written below each other in a Greul. In one teacher would be a dud in arithmetic, wherein the other non-. The education reform has to deal with it, can be like training for critical thinking and passion for doing.

The current Papierl is a typical re-organizational paper and is patient, as many know from large companies. The responsibility is placed in the hands of directors (partly), without an interaction of students, to draw teachers and parents into consideration.

But the main thing, there are now stronger wireless at school. (Digital age we come)