At the time I write intensively on a scientific paper to law and morality, so I'm not really to me to deal with other issues. Everything revolves around these concepts, such as justice, Legislation, Decisions and morality. And they just left by the events of the past and what may happen a strange feeling.

In the philosophy of law, there are two main currents opposed, the one, say in deciding a case (hard cases in particular) morality may have no effect. Judges must be directed only by the law, everything else should not be an issue. However, the opposite position argues, that we can not answer all questions, and this view to the outside must be allowed. Where we find no answers, morality must be included.

Personally, I see no possibility of moral values ​​outside before let, and I would give them a rating of morality here, what is right and what is not. What is considered fair and just not what. A sensitizing but is more than ever necessary, to find answers.