What's really understand it? in which we move for an explanation of terms and how can we imagine the world. In the coming semester I dive into exactly this question, which has risen to Deleuze. Deleuze has described himself as a naive philosophers and that thought pleases me immensely. This fits well with the notice at the Institute of Philosophy, where a philosophy with children is announced.

We (and I not mean me, but all’ outside the wise dead as living heads out) are even to this day no single common solution for philosophical problem issues arrived, thus becoming apparent even in its current semester, I can approach me the topic in a circular motion, Only if that makes me really closer, I can not answer. But I try it just with a certain naivety of a child to look at and I am looking forward.