Today I had a seminar on rhetoric and argumentation and this seminar is especially student teachers to, to prepare for the lessons before students. A first paper or. a first argument was, and who are not the content of my thoughts decisive, or whether the student has prepared it good or bad content, but, that the editor has pointed out to the students after the lecture on, by ergo that the student has been included in the presentation from the beginning to the audience, he loses his speech / lecture. Something I can understand quite, anything but what I personally found objectionable, was the reply to the statement of the student “I want to teach in this way, in which I encourage my students to follow the arguments”, by referring to his years of experience, that it should indeed be, that teachers should motivate students to participate, but students are not really interested. And the more difficult the class, more difficult is the motivation and the more classic of the talk should be.

I think it's not fair, that straight away illusions and desires to be taken. The student will make his own experiences and hopefully many positives and probably much more negative, However, he should not forget, why and how he actually wrapped its way.

I have only taught adults and young adults, and each individual was different but it was common to many, that they want to learn so I could always use new methods, and then it was also desired and requires traditional and conservative to teach.